When I was in class 11 and was studying economics for the first time, there were so many things that I just couldn’t understand. The difference between Positive Economics and Normative Economics was one of those things. So I did some research and in this article, I’m going to share them with you.
Classical and modern economists have explained economics as a positive science. A positive science or economics is that which studies things as they happen in reality. It explains what is, what was, and what will be.
A normative science or normative economics is that which studies things as they should be. It is related to the criteria of “what ought to be.” It makes prescriptions about what should be done. It is the duty of economists to make a careful study of different economic problems and suggest ways and means to solve problems. Economics is studied as a normative science by the economists of the neo-classical era.
Differences between Positive Economics and Normative Economics
The differences between Positive Economics and Normative Economics are mentioned below:
|Basis||Positive Economics||Normative Economics|
|Definition||Positive Economics is that which studies things as they are in reality, as in ‘what is’, ‘what was’, and ‘what will be’.||Normative Economics is that which studies things as they should be, as in ‘what should be’ or ‘what ought to be’.|
|Supported by||It was supported and led by classical and modern economists.||It was supported and led by neo-classical economists.|
|Nature||It is factual or descriptive in nature, which means there doesn’t exist value judgment.||It is based on prescription or suggestion which means there exists value judgment.|
|Deals With||It deals with actual or realistic situations so it studies the cause and effect of economic problems or activities.||It deals with an idealistic situation so it studies only the rightness or wrongness of any decision undertaken.|
|Verification||Arguments or findings under positive science can be verified with actual data.||Arguments or findings under normative economics cannot be verified with actual data.|
|Economic Issues||It deals with how an economic problem is solved or will be solved.||It deals with how an economic problem should be solved.|
|Results||The results of positive economics or science are universally true, i. e., truths are absolute.||The results of normative economics or science are situationally true, i. e., truths are relative.|
|Function||Positive economic studies how different mechanisms function to solve the economic problems||Normative economic studies whether these mechanisms are desirable or not.|
In conclusion, the main aim of economics is not only to diagnose the malady existing in the economy but also to offer valuable advice to curb the problems. It means, besides having ample differences between them, economics is both positive and normative science in the modern world.
If you read this article entirely and want to learn more about the basics of economics, read the articles given below.
4 thoughts on “Chapter 1.1: Positive Economics vs Normative Economics”
I have been absent for some time, but now I remember why I used to love this blog. Thank you, I will try and check back more frequently. How frequently you update your website?
Thanks, I have recently been looking for information approximately this topic for a long time and yours is the best I have came upon till now. But, what in regards to the conclusion? Are you certain about the supply?
I wish to convey my love for your kindness for folks who actually need guidance on in this matter. Your very own commitment to passing the message all-around became wonderfully effective and have all the time made many people just like me to realize their desired goals. Your personal warm and helpful guidelines indicates this much to me and even further to my office colleagues. Warm regards; from all of us.
Undeniably consider that which you said. Your favourite reason appeared to be on the web the simplest thing to keep in mind of. I say to you, I certainly get irked while folks consider issues that they plainly don’t recognise about. You controlled to hit the nail upon the top as well as defined out the entire thing without having side effect , other people can take a signal. Will probably be back to get more. Thanks